Logseq OG vs Obsidian
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Logseq OG
7.0Privacy-first, open-source platform for knowledge sharing and management
Obsidian
8.0Knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files
| Metric | Logseq OG | Obsidian |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 152 | 21.4K |
| 90-day Installs | 299 | 64.7K |
| 365-day Installs | 299 | 190.1K |
| Version | 1.0.0 | 1.13.7 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 130 | 15.5K |
| GitHub Forks | 28 | 5.6K |
| Open Issues | 18 | 1.5K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Language | Clojure | — |
| Last GitHub Commit | 3mo ago | 5mo ago |
| First Seen | Jul 17, 2026 | May 27, 2020 |
Reviews
Logseq OG
Logseq OG is a privacy-first, open-source knowledge management tool that emphasizes file-based storage for full user control. It offers a flexible platform for capturing and organizing ideas, ideal for privacy-conscious users seeking a decentralized approach to knowledge sharing.
Provides a platform for capturing, organizing, and sharing knowledge in a privacy-focused manner.
Pros
- + Privacy-first approach ensures user data control
- + Open-source nature allows for customization and transparency
- + File-based storage offers decentralized knowledge management
Cons
- - Limited community traction and discussion
- - Early-stage development may lead to less stability
Obsidian
Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that organizes plain text Markdown files, offering extensive plugins and integrations. It benefits productivity-focused users who prefer a flexible, local-first approach to note-taking and information management.
Obsidian is a knowledge base that organizes and enhances plain text Markdown files with rich features and plugins.
Pros
- + Works with local Markdown files, offering flexibility and control
- + Extensive plugin ecosystem for customization
- + Introduction of CLI and TUI enhances accessibility
Cons
- - Steep learning curve for new users
- - Limited cloud sync features compared to competitors