LocalSend vs Transmission
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
LocalSend
8.0Open-source cross-platform alternative to AirDrop
Transmission
7.0Open-source BitTorrent client
| Metric | LocalSend | Transmission |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Communication | Utilities |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 6.4K | 2.4K |
| 90-day Installs | 18.3K | 6.9K |
| 365-day Installs | 57.5K | 26.6K |
| Version | 1.17.0 | 4.1.3 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 76.3K | 14.4K |
| GitHub Forks | 4.0K | 1.4K |
| Open Issues | 889 | 745 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Language | Dart | C++ |
| Last GitHub Commit | 3mo ago | 3mo ago |
| First Seen | Sep 25, 2024 | Sep 19, 2012 |
Reviews
LocalSend
LocalSend is an open-source, cross-platform alternative to AirDrop, offering a simple and free way to share files between devices. Its ease of use and flexibility make it ideal for users seeking a reliable file-sharing solution without platform restrictions.
Enables file sharing between devices on the same network through a user-friendly interface.
Pros
- + Open-source and free to use.
- + Cross-platform support for various operating systems.
- + User-friendly and intuitive interface.
Cons
- - Does not auto-update, requiring manual checks for new versions.
- - Some technical issues reported, such as network connectivity problems.
Transmission
Transmission is a reliable open-source BitTorrent client known for its efficiency and simplicity, making it ideal for users seeking a lightweight, no-frills torrenting experience. It supports cross-platform functionality and offers strong customization options for advanced users.
Transmission allows users to download and share files using the BitTorrent protocol.
Pros
- + Open-source and free to use
- + Lightweight and resource-efficient
- + Cross-platform support
Cons
- - Basic user interface
- - Occasional security vulnerabilities