kiro vs Cursor
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
kiro
7.0Agent-centric IDE with spec-driven development
Cursor
7.5Write, edit, and chat about your code with AI
| Metric | kiro | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 7.5 |
| 30-day Installs | 1.2K | 11.3K |
| 90-day Installs | 3.7K | 34.7K |
| 365-day Installs | 17.3K | 133.3K |
| Version | 0.11.133 | 3.2.21,806df57ed3b6f1ee0175140d38039a38574ec722 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 3.2K | 32.4K |
| GitHub Forks | 166 | 2.2K |
| Open Issues | 2.4K | 1 |
| License | — | — |
| Language | TypeScript | — |
| Last GitHub Commit | 2mo ago | 3mo ago |
| First Seen | Jul 14, 2025 | Mar 30, 2023 |
Reviews
kiro
Kiro is an innovative AI-powered IDE designed to enhance development workflows through spec-driven development. It offers intelligent assistance, automates tasks, and streamlines the process from prototype to production, making it ideal for developers seeking a modern, efficient coding experience.
Kiro provides an AI-driven development environment that uses specifications to guide and automate coding tasks.
Pros
- + AI-driven assistance for development tasks
- + Spec-driven development workflow
- + Integration across development stages
Cons
- - High number of open issues
- - Performance and pricing concerns
Cursor
Cursor is an AI-powered code editor that enables developers to write, edit, and collaborate on code with real-time AI suggestions and chat features. It stands out for its unique combination of AI-driven code assistance and team collaboration capabilities, making it a valuable tool for developers seeking enhanced productivity and feedback.
Cursor is an AI-powered code editor that provides real-time code suggestions, editing, and collaboration features.
Pros
- + AI-driven code suggestions and real-time feedback enhance productivity
- + Collaboration features allow for team coding and brainstorming
- + Strong community and developer interest as evidenced by GitHub stats
Cons
- - Occasional bugs and reliability issues reported by users
- - Negative press mentions regarding security and user experience