Jellyfin vs Universal Media Server
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Jellyfin
8.5Media system
Universal Media Server
8.0Media server supporting DLNA, UPnP and HTTP(S)
| Metric | Jellyfin | Universal Media Server |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media & Design | Media & Design |
| AI Score | 8.5 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 739 | 47 |
| 90-day Installs | 2.1K | 139 |
| 365-day Installs | 6.9K | 658 |
| Version | 10.11.8 | 15.5.0 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 49.2K | 2.6K |
| GitHub Forks | 4.5K | 510 |
| Open Issues | 889 | 392 |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | C# | Java |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | May 18, 2020 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
Jellyfin
Jellyfin is a free, open-source media system that serves as a community-driven alternative to proprietary platforms like Plex. It supports streaming, media library management, and integrates with various devices, making it ideal for users seeking a decentralized media experience.
Jellyfin provides a platform for streaming and managing digital media libraries across devices.
Pros
- + Open-source and decentralized, promoting privacy and freedom.
- + Comprehensive media library management and streaming support.
- + Cross-platform compatibility and device integration.
Cons
- - Manual updates required for new versions.
- - Less active discussion on Reddit compared to Hacker News.
Universal Media Server
Universal Media Server is a robust media streaming solution supporting DLNA, UPnP, and HTTP(S). It offers a versatile platform for serving media to various devices, appealing to users seeking self-hosted, open-source alternatives.
Serves media content over DLNA, UPnP, and HTTP(S) protocols.
Pros
- + Supports multiple media protocols for versatile streaming
- + Open-source with active development
- + Self-hosting capabilities for enhanced privacy control
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - High number of open issues may indicate potential instability