Jami vs Signal
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Jami
7.0Decentralised instant messenger and softphone
Signal
8.0Instant messaging application focusing on security
| Metric | Jami | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Communication | Communication |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 18 | 2.8K |
| 90-day Installs | 52 | 9.4K |
| 365-day Installs | 281 | 35.4K |
| Version | 2.39,2026042111 | 8.8.0 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 28 | 28.4K |
| GitHub Forks | 8 | 6.7K |
| Open Issues | 3 | 476 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Shell | Kotlin |
| Last GitHub Commit | 5y ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2023 | Nov 1, 2017 |
Reviews
Jami
Jami is a decentralized instant messenger and softphone that focuses on privacy and freedom. It offers secure communication features, including encrypted messaging, voice, and video calls, making it ideal for users seeking alternatives to mainstream platforms.
Jami enables secure, decentralized communication through instant messaging, voice, and video calls without relying on central servers.
Pros
- + Decentralized and privacy-focused communication
- + Open-source with MIT license
- + Supports instant messaging, voice, and video calls
Cons
- - Limited recent GitHub activity
- - No community discussion on Reddit
Signal
Signal is a privacy-focused instant messaging app with end-to-end encryption, designed for secure communication. It supports text, voice, and video calls, benefiting users who prioritize security and anonymity.
Signal provides secure, encrypted messaging and communication services for text, voice, and video calls.
Pros
- + End-to-end encryption ensures secure communication
- + User-friendly interface with strong privacy features
- + Regular updates and active development
Cons
- - Persistent issues with call functionality
- - Lack of desktop app features like read receipts
- - MacOS app is a web wrapper, not a native experience