Jami vs Jitsi
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Jami
7.0Decentralised instant messenger and softphone
Jitsi
8.0Open-source video calls and chat
| Metric | Jami | Jitsi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Communication | Communication |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 18 | 16 |
| 90-day Installs | 52 | 50 |
| 365-day Installs | 281 | 233 |
| Version | 2.39,2026042111 | 2.10.5550 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 28 | 4.3K |
| GitHub Forks | 8 | 979 |
| Open Issues | 3 | 221 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Shell | Java |
| Last GitHub Commit | 5y ago | 9mo ago |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2023 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
Jami
Jami is a decentralized instant messenger and softphone that focuses on privacy and freedom. It offers secure communication features, including encrypted messaging, voice, and video calls, making it ideal for users seeking alternatives to mainstream platforms.
Jami enables secure, decentralized communication through instant messaging, voice, and video calls without relying on central servers.
Pros
- + Decentralized and privacy-focused communication
- + Open-source with MIT license
- + Supports instant messaging, voice, and video calls
Cons
- - Limited recent GitHub activity
- - No community discussion on Reddit
Jitsi
Jitsi is an open-source video calling and chat application that supports multiple communication protocols, making it ideal for users who prioritize privacy and flexibility. It offers end-to-end encryption and is suitable for teams or individuals seeking secure communication solutions.
Jitsi enables video calls, chat, and file transfers using protocols like SIP, XMPP, and IRC.
Pros
- + Open-source with a permissive Apache-2.0 license
- + Supports multiple communication protocols
- + Auto-updates for the latest features and security
- + Active and engaged community
- + End-to-end encryption capabilities
Cons
- - Lower 30-day install count
- - Open issue regarding OMEMO support