Iriun vs Deskreen
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Iriun
6.0Use your phone's camera as a wireless webcam
Deskreen
8.0Turns any device with a web browser into a secondary screen
| Metric | Iriun | Deskreen |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Utilities |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 22 | 175 |
| 90-day Installs | 56 | 460 |
| 365-day Installs | 234 | 1.4K |
| Version | 2.9.1 | 3.2.16 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 20.3K |
| GitHub Forks | — | 1.1K |
| Open Issues | — | 20 |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | — | TypeScript |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 8mo ago |
| First Seen | May 10, 2020 | Feb 4, 2021 |
Reviews
Iriun
Iriun allows users to leverage their smartphone's camera as a wireless webcam, offering a convenient solution for content creation, online meetings, or surveillance. Its key features include seamless integration with macOS and ease of setup, benefiting those without a dedicated webcam.
Iriun enables the use of a smartphone's camera as a wireless webcam for streaming video to a computer.
Pros
- + Convenient webcam alternative without additional hardware
- + Wireless setup and compatibility with macOS
- + Potentially higher video quality than built-in laptop cameras
Cons
- - Lack of auto-update feature
- - Reliance on phone proximity and network connection
Deskreen
Deskreen allows users to turn any device with a web browser into a secondary screen, offering a unique solution for extending desktop displays. Its open-source nature and cross-platform support make it appealing to developers and productivity-focused users.
Deskreen enables any web browser-enabled device to function as an additional screen for your computer.
Pros
- + Open-source with a strong community backing
- + Cross-platform support and flexibility
- + High community interest and active development
Cons
- - Lacks auto-update functionality
- - Some users report technical limitations