Grammarly Desktop vs Cotypist
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Grammarly Desktop
8.0Grammarly for desktop
Cotypist
6.0System-wide AI autocomplete
| Metric | Grammarly Desktop | Cotypist |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 6.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 425 | 113 |
| 90-day Installs | 1.1K | 382 |
| 365-day Installs | 5.2K | 569 |
| Version | 1.201.0.0 | 2026.5 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | — |
| GitHub Forks | — | — |
| Open Issues | — | — |
| License | — | — |
| Language | — | — |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | — |
| First Seen | Dec 4, 2021 | Jun 20, 2026 |
Reviews
Grammarly Desktop
Grammarly Desktop is a comprehensive writing assistant that offers real-time grammar, spelling, and style checks across various applications. Its ability to enhance writing quality makes it beneficial for writers, bloggers, and professionals who need polished content.
Provides real-time writing assistance and suggestions across multiple applications.
Pros
- + Real-time writing assistance across multiple applications
- + Comprehensive grammar, spelling, and style checks
- + Integration with popular apps like Chrome, Word, and more
Cons
- - Free version has limited features
- - Premium subscription can be expensive
Cotypist
Cotypist offers a unique system-wide AI autocomplete feature, enhancing typing efficiency across all macOS applications. It benefits users who frequently type, such as writers and professionals, by providing real-time, context-aware suggestions.
Cotypist provides AI-powered autocomplete functionality across all system applications, aiding in faster and more efficient typing.
Pros
- + System-wide functionality enhances productivity across all applications
- + Real-time predictions save time and improve efficiency
- + AI-driven suggestions offer context-aware assistance
Cons
- - Potential high resource usage due to AI processing
- - Privacy concerns regarding data processing of user input