Skip to content
cask.news
← Browse all apps

Gopass UI vs 1Password

Side-by-side comparison for macOS

Gopass UI

6.0
Security & Privacy

Password manager for teams

1Password

8.0
Security & Privacy

Password manager that keeps all passwords secure behind one password

Metric Gopass UI 1Password
Category Security & Privacy Security & Privacy
AI Score 6.0 8.0
30-day Installs 7 5.9K
90-day Installs 17 17.3K
365-day Installs 56 56.0K
Version 0.8.0 8.12.12
Auto-updates No Yes
Deprecated Yes No
GitHub Stars 268 648
GitHub Forks 19 253
Open Issues 25 209
License MIT MIT
Language TypeScript Go
Last GitHub Commit 3y ago 8mo ago
First Seen Dec 3, 2019 Dec 11, 2014

Reviews

Gopass UI

Gopass UI is a password manager for teams, offering a visual interface for managing passwords and secrets across platforms. It integrates with the gopass CLI, providing a user-friendly experience for teams to securely handle credentials.

Provides a visual interface for team password management using the gopass CLI.

Pros

  • + Cross-platform functionality
  • + Integration with gopass CLI
  • + MIT license

Cons

  • - Low installation count
  • - Open issues affecting user experience

1Password

1Password is a leading password manager that securely stores and organizes all your passwords behind a single master password. It offers features like password generation, autofill, and secure sharing, making it ideal for individuals and teams seeking robust password management. Its cross-platform support and integration with various services enhance its usability for a wide range of users.

1Password securely manages and organizes passwords, allowing users to access all accounts with a single master password.

Pros

  • + Robust security features and password management capabilities.
  • + Cross-platform support and seamless integration with various services.
  • + Community support with a strong presence on GitHub and active development.

Cons

  • - Subscription model without local vaults may not suit all users.
  • - High number of open issues on GitHub suggests potential maintenance concerns.