GoldenPassport vs MacPass
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
GoldenPassport
5.0Native implementation of Google Authenticator based on Swift3
MacPass
8.0Open-source, KeePass-client and password manager
| Metric | GoldenPassport | MacPass |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security & Privacy | Security & Privacy |
| AI Score | 5.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 5 | 125 |
| 90-day Installs | 10 | 356 |
| 365-day Installs | 62 | 1.7K |
| Version | 0.1.7 | 0.8.1 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | 415 | 6.8K |
| GitHub Forks | 62 | 469 |
| Open Issues | 14 | 292 |
| License | — | NOASSERTION |
| Language | Objective-C | Objective-C |
| Last GitHub Commit | 3y ago | 1y ago |
| First Seen | Mar 8, 2021 | Oct 31, 2013 |
Reviews
GoldenPassport
GoldenPassport is a native macOS implementation of Google Authenticator, offering two-factor authentication directly on your Mac. It provides a user-friendly interface for managing OTP-based security keys, ideal for users seeking a desktop solution for two-factor authentication.
GoldenPassport acts as a two-factor authentication tool, generating and managing time-based one-time passwords (TOTPs) for secure account access.
Pros
- + Native macOS integration for seamless use
- + Open-source, allowing for customization and security audits
- + Auto-updates keep the application current
Cons
- - Low adoption and limited recent updates may affect reliability
- - Critical issues, such as app crashes and non-response, remain unresolved
MacPass
MacPass is a native macOS KeePass client and password manager that offers a secure and open-source solution for managing passwords. It integrates seamlessly with KeePass databases, providing a user-friendly experience for password management on macOS.
MacPass is a password manager that allows users to securely store, organize, and manage their passwords using KeePass database files.
Pros
- + Open-source and secure password management solution
- + Native macOS integration for a smooth user experience
- + Supports KeePass databases for seamless import and compatibility
Cons
- - High number of open issues may indicate areas needing attention
- - Lack of broader community engagement beyond GitHub