Skip to content
cask.news
← Browse all apps

Gloomberb vs Wealthfolio

Side-by-side comparison for macOS

Gloomberb

7.0
Finance

Finance terminal

Wealthfolio

8.0
Finance

Investment portfolio tracker

Metric Gloomberb Wealthfolio
Category Finance Finance
AI Score 7.0 8.0
30-day Installs 87 32
90-day Installs 87 75
365-day Installs 87 301
Version 0.17.6 3.10.0
Auto-updates Yes Yes
Deprecated No No
GitHub Stars 2.2K 7.1K
GitHub Forks 136 439
Open Issues 7 200
License NOASSERTION AGPL-3.0
Language TypeScript Rust
Last GitHub Commit 28d ago 7mo ago
First Seen Sep 21, 2026 Sep 7, 2024

Reviews

Gloomberb

Gloomberb is a finance terminal that brings stock data, news, and analysis directly to your CLI. It's ideal for traders and finance professionals who prefer command-line tools for quick insights and real-time updates.

Gloomberb provides financial data and analysis through a terminal interface.

Pros

  • + Provides real-time financial data and news directly in the terminal
  • + Active development with frequent updates
  • + Strong community engagement on Hacker News

Cons

  • - Performance issues reported, particularly with CPU usage
  • - Some financial tickers may not be available

Wealthfolio

Wealthfolio is a private and secure investment portfolio tracker built with Rust, offering a beautiful and intuitive interface. It allows users to manage and analyze their investments, with support for self-hosting and cross-platform use. Ideal for investors seeking transparency and control over their financial data.

Wealthfolio tracks and manages investment portfolios, providing detailed analytics and performance metrics in a secure and private environment.

Pros

  • + Private and secure investment tracking with Rust
  • + Beautiful and intuitive user interface
  • + Cross-platform support and self-hosting capabilities
  • + Open-source with active community and regular updates

Cons

  • - Some users report issues with syncing and account currency support
  • - Limited mobile functionality compared to desktop
  • - Shift to a paid model for syncing features may deter some users