Force Paste vs PopClip
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Force Paste
6.0PopClip
8.0Used to access context-specific actions when text is selected
| Metric | Force Paste | PopClip |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Productivity |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 10 | 248 |
| 90-day Installs | 45 | 806 |
| 365-day Installs | 165 | 3.3K |
| Version | 1.0.1 | 2025.9.2 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | 199 | 2.0K |
| GitHub Forks | 22 | 461 |
| Open Issues | 13 | 718 |
| License | — | MIT |
| Language | Shell | JavaScript |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1y ago | 2mo ago |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2023 | Mar 14, 2016 |
Reviews
Force Paste
Force Paste enables users to paste text into restricted fields, such as password dialogs, offering a unique solution for scenarios where standard copy-paste is blocked. It benefits users needing quick access to frequently used passwords or sensitive information, enhancing productivity in specific workflows.
Force Paste allows users to paste text into restricted fields where standard paste functionality is typically unavailable.
Pros
- + Unique functionality to paste into restricted fields
- + Support for multiple macOS versions, though some compatibility issues remain
- + Open-source, fostering transparency and potential community contributions
Cons
- - Lack of auto-updates requiring manual checks for updates
- - Low adoption rate indicated by limited installs and community engagement
PopClip
PopClip enhances text selection with context-specific actions, offering a customizable tool for quick tasks. It benefits users seeking efficient text handling and specific workflow needs.
PopClip provides quick actions when text is selected, enabling efficient task handling.
Pros
- + Efficient text handling
- + Good macOS integration
- + Customizable extensions
Cons
- - High number of open issues
- - MacOS-only availability