Material Symbols vs Font Awesome
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Material Symbols
7.0Font Awesome
8.0| Metric | Material Symbols | Font Awesome |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media & Design | Media & Design |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 14 | 225 |
| 90-day Installs | 31 | 634 |
| 365-day Installs | 124 | 2.5K |
| Version | latest | 7.2.0 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 249 | 76.4K |
| GitHub Forks | 41 | 12.2K |
| Open Issues | 29 | 317 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Language | CSS | JavaScript |
| Last GitHub Commit | 2mo ago | 2mo ago |
| First Seen | May 15, 2024 | May 15, 2024 |
Reviews
Material Symbols
Material Symbols is a font offering Material Design icons optimized as variable fonts and SVGs, ideal for web and app design. It benefits developers and designers needing scalable icons, with active GitHub contributions and some unresolved technical issues.
Provides Material Design icons as variable fonts and optimized SVGs.
Pros
- + Optimized SVGs and variable fonts for design flexibility.
- + Active development and regular updates.
- + Free and open-source under Apache-2.0 license.
Cons
- - Integration issues with certain frameworks like Tailwind.
- - Ongoing technical challenges with sizing and properties.
Font Awesome
Font Awesome is a widely-used icon toolkit that provides scalable vector icons, making it essential for web and app design. It offers a vast library of icons, including brand-specific ones, and is highly customizable. Designers and developers benefit from its flexibility and extensive community support.
Font Awesome provides a comprehensive library of scalable vector icons and CSS toolkit for web and app design.
Pros
- + Extensive library of icons, including brand-specific ones
- + Highly customizable and scalable
- + Strong community and developer support
Cons
- - No auto-updates available
- - A large number of open GitHub issues may indicate maintenance challenges