Skip to content
cask.news
← Browse all apps

Font Awesome vs SF Symbols

Side-by-side comparison for macOS

Font Awesome

8.0
Media & Design

SF Symbols

7.0
Developer Tools

Tool that provides consistent, highly configurable symbols for apps

Metric Font Awesome SF Symbols
Category Media & Design Developer Tools
AI Score 8.0 7.0
30-day Installs 225 628
90-day Installs 634 2.1K
365-day Installs 2.5K 9.9K
Version 7.2.0 7.2,119
Auto-updates No Yes
Deprecated No No
GitHub Stars 76.4K 10
GitHub Forks 12.2K 3
Open Issues 317 2
License NOASSERTION BSD-3-Clause
Language JavaScript Dart
Last GitHub Commit 2mo ago 3y ago
First Seen May 15, 2024 Jun 4, 2019

Reviews

Font Awesome

Font Awesome is a widely-used icon toolkit that provides scalable vector icons, making it essential for web and app design. It offers a vast library of icons, including brand-specific ones, and is highly customizable. Designers and developers benefit from its flexibility and extensive community support.

Font Awesome provides a comprehensive library of scalable vector icons and CSS toolkit for web and app design.

Pros

  • + Extensive library of icons, including brand-specific ones
  • + Highly customizable and scalable
  • + Strong community and developer support

Cons

  • - No auto-updates available
  • - A large number of open GitHub issues may indicate maintenance challenges

SF Symbols

SF Symbols is a tool for macOS and iOS developers to create and manage consistent, highly configurable icons for their applications. It offers a wide range of symbols that can be customized to fit various design needs, making it a valuable asset for developers aiming to enhance their app's visual appeal and usability.

SF Symbols provides a library of scalable vector icons that can be easily integrated into macOS and iOS applications, allowing developers to create consistent and visually appealing user interfaces.

Pros

  • + Extensive library of customizable icons
  • + Integration with macOS and iOS development workflows
  • + BSD-3-Clause license allows for broad usage

Cons

  • - Limited recent community engagement
  • - Open issues regarding compatibility with newer frameworks