Fluid vs WebCatalog
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Fluid
6.0Tool to turn a website into a desktop app
WebCatalog
7.0Tool to run web apps like desktop apps
| Metric | Fluid | WebCatalog |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 19 | 123 |
| 90-day Installs | 61 | 343 |
| 365-day Installs | 330 | 1.6K |
| Version | 2.1.2 | 74.7.1 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 4 |
| GitHub Forks | — | 2 |
| Open Issues | — | - |
| License | — | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | — | JavaScript |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 8y ago |
| First Seen | Oct 14, 2012 | Feb 21, 2017 |
Reviews
Fluid
Fluid allows users to turn any website into a desktop application, offering a seamless experience for frequent website visitors. It is particularly beneficial for those who want to access web apps like Gmail or Twitter without relying on a browser, providing a lightweight and integrated macOS experience.
Fluid converts websites into desktop applications, allowing them to be used like native apps.
Pros
- + Lightweight and efficient for accessing web apps
- + Good macOS integration with features like app switching
- + Customizable URLs and keyboard shortcuts
Cons
- - No auto-update feature requiring manual checks
- - Limited customization options and features
WebCatalog
WebCatalog allows users to run web apps as native desktop applications, offering a seamless experience with customization options. It benefits those looking to streamline their workflow by integrating web tools into their desktop environment.
Converts websites into desktop applications with one-click installations.
Pros
- + One-click installation simplifies adding web apps to the desktop.
- + Customization options enhance user experience.
- + Cross-platform support offers versatility.
Cons
- - Inactive development raises concerns about future updates and support.
- - Potential reliability issues due to lack of recent updates.