Fluid vs Multi
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Fluid
6.0Tool to turn a website into a desktop app
Multi
7.0Create apps from groups of websites
| Metric | Fluid | Multi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Productivity | Utilities |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 19 | 27 |
| 90-day Installs | 61 | 81 |
| 365-day Installs | 330 | 255 |
| Version | 2.1.2 | 3.0.2 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 1.4K |
| GitHub Forks | — | 42 |
| Open Issues | — | 31 |
| License | — | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | — | Swift |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 2mo ago |
| First Seen | Oct 14, 2012 | Sep 21, 2020 |
Reviews
Fluid
Fluid allows users to turn any website into a desktop application, offering a seamless experience for frequent website visitors. It is particularly beneficial for those who want to access web apps like Gmail or Twitter without relying on a browser, providing a lightweight and integrated macOS experience.
Fluid converts websites into desktop applications, allowing them to be used like native apps.
Pros
- + Lightweight and efficient for accessing web apps
- + Good macOS integration with features like app switching
- + Customizable URLs and keyboard shortcuts
Cons
- - No auto-update feature requiring manual checks
- - Limited customization options and features
Multi
Multi allows users to create custom macOS apps from collections of websites, offering a unique way to bundle web-based tools into a single application. It's ideal for developers and power users who want to streamline their workflow with tailored web apps.
Creates custom macOS applications from groups of websites.
Pros
- + Creates custom, lightweight macOS apps from websites.
- + Open-source with a strong community and active development.
- + Written in Swift, providing modern and efficient performance.
Cons
- - No auto-update feature.
- - Limited recent community discussion despite active development.