Skip to content
cask.news
← Browse all apps

Fluid vs Clicker for YouTube

Side-by-side comparison for macOS

Fluid

6.0
Productivity

Tool to turn a website into a desktop app

Clicker for YouTube

6.0
Media & Design

Standalone YouTube app

Metric Fluid Clicker for YouTube
Category Productivity Media & Design
AI Score 6.0 6.0
30-day Installs 7 17
90-day Installs 25 38
365-day Installs 255 126
Version 2.1.2 1.22
Auto-updates No Yes
Deprecated No No
GitHub Stars — —
GitHub Forks — —
Open Issues — —
License — —
Language — —
Last GitHub Commit — —
First Seen Oct 14, 2012 Aug 9, 2023

Reviews

Fluid

Fluid allows users to turn any website into a desktop application, offering a seamless experience for frequent website visitors. It is particularly beneficial for those who want to access web apps like Gmail or Twitter without relying on a browser, providing a lightweight and integrated macOS experience.

Fluid converts websites into desktop applications, allowing them to be used like native apps.

Pros

  • + Lightweight and efficient for accessing web apps
  • + Good macOS integration with features like app switching
  • + Customizable URLs and keyboard shortcuts

Cons

  • - No auto-update feature requiring manual checks
  • - Limited customization options and features

Clicker for YouTube

Clicker for YouTube offers a native macOS experience for YouTube with features like pip, ad blocking, and keyboard shortcuts. It’s designed for power users and content creators seeking a more interactive and customizable way to watch videos.

Provides a native YouTube experience on macOS with additional features like pip, ad blocking, and keyboard shortcuts.

Pros

  • + Native macOS experience with YouTube functionality
  • + Built-in ad blocker and pip support
  • + Keyboard shortcuts and dark mode compatibility
  • + Open-source and free to use

Cons

  • - Limited recent updates and adoption
  • - No mention of frequent community support or updates