Skip to content
cask.news
← Browse all apps

Fluid vs Clicker for YouTube

Side-by-side comparison for macOS

Fluid

6.0
Productivity

Tool to turn a website into a desktop app

Clicker for YouTube

6.0
Media & Design

Standalone YouTube app

Metric Fluid Clicker for YouTube
Category Productivity Media & Design
AI Score 6.0 6.0
30-day Installs 19 10
90-day Installs 61 30
365-day Installs 330 110
Version 2.1.2 1.22
Auto-updates No Yes
Deprecated No No
GitHub Stars
GitHub Forks
Open Issues
License
Language
Last GitHub Commit
First Seen Oct 14, 2012 Aug 9, 2023

Reviews

Fluid

Fluid allows users to turn any website into a desktop application, offering a seamless experience for frequent website visitors. It is particularly beneficial for those who want to access web apps like Gmail or Twitter without relying on a browser, providing a lightweight and integrated macOS experience.

Fluid converts websites into desktop applications, allowing them to be used like native apps.

Pros

  • + Lightweight and efficient for accessing web apps
  • + Good macOS integration with features like app switching
  • + Customizable URLs and keyboard shortcuts

Cons

  • - No auto-update feature requiring manual checks
  • - Limited customization options and features

Clicker for YouTube

Clicker for YouTube offers a native macOS experience for YouTube with features like pip, ad blocking, and keyboard shortcuts. It’s designed for power users and content creators seeking a more interactive and customizable way to watch videos.

Provides a native YouTube experience on macOS with additional features like pip, ad blocking, and keyboard shortcuts.

Pros

  • + Native macOS experience with YouTube functionality
  • + Built-in ad blocker and pip support
  • + Keyboard shortcuts and dark mode compatibility
  • + Open-source and free to use

Cons

  • - Limited recent updates and adoption
  • - No mention of frequent community support or updates