Fing Desktop vs Wireshark
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Fing Desktop
6.0Network scanner
Wireshark
9.0Network protocol analyzer
| Metric | Fing Desktop | Wireshark |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 9.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 89 | 4.5K |
| 90-day Installs | 276 | 12.8K |
| 365-day Installs | 1.1K | 47.8K |
| Version | 3.10.1 | 4.6.5 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 9.1K |
| GitHub Forks | — | 2.1K |
| Open Issues | — | 2 |
| License | — | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | — | C |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Oct 27, 2014 | Aug 14, 2013 |
Reviews
Fing Desktop
Fing Desktop is a network scanner that helps users discover and monitor devices on their network. It offers features like device detection, network mapping, and security monitoring, making it useful for network administrators and security-conscious users.
Fing Desktop scans the local network and displays information about connected devices.
Pros
- + Helpful for network administrators and security monitoring
- + User-friendly interface
- + Provides detailed device information
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Limited customization options
- - Sparse community support
Wireshark
Wireshark is a powerful network protocol analyzer used for debugging and analyzing network traffic. It supports a wide range of protocols and offers both graphical and command-line interfaces, making it a versatile tool for developers and network administrators.
Wireshark captures and analyzes network traffic in real-time, providing detailed insights into data packets and network behavior.
Pros
- + Open-source and free to use
- + Extensive protocol support and deep packet inspection
- + Active development and community support
- + User-friendly graphical interface
- + Cross-platform compatibility
- + Real-time network monitoring
- + Scripting and automation capabilities
Cons
- - Steep learning curve for new users
- - Can be resource-intensive for large captures