Fetch vs Transmit
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Fetch
8.0File transfer client
Transmit
8.0File transfer application
| Metric | Fetch | Transmit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Utilities |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 6 | 334 |
| 90-day Installs | 17 | 1.1K |
| 365-day Installs | 71 | 4.2K |
| Version | 5.8.3 | 5.11.6 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 1.8K | — |
| GitHub Forks | 358 | — |
| Open Issues | 121 | — |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Language | Kotlin | — |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1y ago | — |
| First Seen | Sep 1, 2014 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
Fetch
Fetch is a reliable file transfer client built with Kotlin, designed for developers seeking a robust solution for file downloads. It leverages the best practices from its Android library counterpart, making it a solid choice for developers handling file transfers.
Fetch transfers files efficiently, catering to developers' needs for reliable file downloads.
Pros
- + Open-source with a permissive Apache-2.0 license, fostering community contribution.
- + Actively maintained with regular updates and a responsive developer team.
- + Relevant and reliable, supported by a strong developer community.
Cons
- - Lacks auto-update functionality, requiring manual checks for updates.
- - Some open issues, particularly around Android 14 compatibility and file corruption, may affect user experience.
Transmit
Transmit is a feature-rich file transfer application designed for efficient uploading, downloading, and management of files across various servers and cloud storage services. Its user-friendly interface, support for multiple protocols, and integration with cloud services make it a valuable tool for professionals and developers who need reliable file transfer capabilities.
Transmit enables users to transfer files using protocols like FTP, SFTP, and WebDAV, as well as manage cloud storage services.
Pros
- + User-friendly interface with a polished design.
- + Support for multiple file transfer protocols and cloud integration.
- + Regular updates and active development.
Cons
- - Higher price point compared to competitors.
- - May lack some advanced features found in alternatives like Cyberduck.