Fetch vs OpenMTP
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Fetch
8.0File transfer client
OpenMTP
8.0Android file transfer
| Metric | Fetch | OpenMTP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Utilities |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 6 | 1.8K |
| 90-day Installs | 17 | 4.6K |
| 365-day Installs | 71 | 15.6K |
| Version | 5.8.3 | 3.2.25 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 1.8K | 6.3K |
| GitHub Forks | 358 | 250 |
| Open Issues | 121 | 159 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Kotlin | JavaScript |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1y ago | 8mo ago |
| First Seen | Sep 1, 2014 | Jan 26, 2020 |
Reviews
Fetch
Fetch is a reliable file transfer client built with Kotlin, designed for developers seeking a robust solution for file downloads. It leverages the best practices from its Android library counterpart, making it a solid choice for developers handling file transfers.
Fetch transfers files efficiently, catering to developers' needs for reliable file downloads.
Pros
- + Open-source with a permissive Apache-2.0 license, fostering community contribution.
- + Actively maintained with regular updates and a responsive developer team.
- + Relevant and reliable, supported by a strong developer community.
Cons
- - Lacks auto-update functionality, requiring manual checks for updates.
- - Some open issues, particularly around Android 14 compatibility and file corruption, may affect user experience.
OpenMTP
OpenMTP is a feature-rich Android file transfer application for macOS, offering advanced capabilities beyond the default Android File Transfer. It supports seamless file transfers, sync modes, and is ideal for users needing reliable and efficient Android file management on macOS.
Enables file transfer between Android devices and macOS systems.
Pros
- + Cross-platform compatibility with advanced features for macOS users
- + Feature-rich with options like sync mode and file grouping
- + Open-source with MIT license, fostering community contribution
Cons
- - Lacks support for Garmin devices despite a closed enhancement request
- - No auto-update feature, requiring manual checks for updates