Skip to content
cask.news
← Browse all apps

Duo Desktop vs Ente Auth

Side-by-side comparison for macOS

Duo Desktop

4.5
Security & Privacy

Endpoint health checks for Duo-protected applications

Ente Auth

8.0
Security & Privacy

Desktop client for Ente Auth

Metric Duo Desktop Ente Auth
Category Security & Privacy Security & Privacy
AI Score 4.5 8.0
30-day Installs 25 204
90-day Installs 49 578
365-day Installs 49 2.0K
Version 7.19.0.0 4.4.23
Auto-updates No No
Deprecated No No
GitHub Stars 26 25.1K
GitHub Forks 3 1.5K
Open Issues - 531
License AGPL-3.0
Language JavaScript Dart
Last GitHub Commit 9y ago 3mo ago
First Seen May 18, 2026 Apr 7, 2024

Reviews

Duo Desktop

Duo Desktop is a security-focused application designed for endpoint health checks, ensuring devices meet specific security criteria before accessing Duo-protected services. It is particularly useful for organizations prioritizing device security and compliance.

Performs endpoint health checks to verify that devices meet security requirements for accessing Duo-protected applications.

Pros

  • + Dedicated to enhancing endpoint security for Duo-protected applications
  • + Straightforward purpose for ensuring device compliance
  • + Potential integration with existing Duo security infrastructure

Cons

  • - No auto-update feature, which could pose security risks
  • - Inactive development and outdated codebase

Ente Auth

Ente Auth is an open-source, end-to-end encrypted 2FA app that offers TOTP and passkey management across multiple platforms. It's ideal for users seeking a privacy-focused alternative to proprietary 2FA solutions.

Ente Auth is a desktop client for managing two-factor authentication (2FA) through TOTP and passkeys with encrypted backups.

Pros

  • + Open-source and end-to-end encrypted for enhanced privacy
  • + Cross-platform support including desktop, mobile, and web
  • + Self-hosting capability for greater control over data
  • + User-friendly interface for managing 2FA

Cons

  • - No auto-update feature for the desktop app
  • - Lacks native passkey support
  • - High number of open GitHub issues may indicate areas needing improvement