DeviceShelf vs Wireshark
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
DeviceShelf
7.0Scanner for devices, open ports and security risks on the local network
Wireshark
9.0Network protocol analyzer
| Metric | DeviceShelf | Wireshark |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security & Privacy | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 9.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 69 | 3.8K |
| 90-day Installs | 69 | 10.5K |
| 365-day Installs | 69 | 50.6K |
| Version | 1.9.80 | 4.6.9 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 9.1K |
| GitHub Forks | — | 2.1K |
| Open Issues | — | 2 |
| License | — | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | — | C |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 7mo ago |
| First Seen | Sep 23, 2026 | Aug 14, 2013 |
Reviews
DeviceShelf
DeviceShelf is a local-first network scanner that identifies devices, open ports, and security risks on your local network. It offers a graphical interface for easy monitoring and is ideal for homelab enthusiasts and those concerned with network security.
Scans the local network to detect devices, open ports, and potential security risks.
Pros
- + Local-first approach with no cloud backend
- + Graphical user interface for easy monitoring
- + Useful for homelabs and network security enthusiasts
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Small user base with limited community support
Wireshark
Wireshark is a powerful network protocol analyzer used for debugging and analyzing network traffic. It supports a wide range of protocols and offers both graphical and command-line interfaces, making it a versatile tool for developers and network administrators.
Wireshark captures and analyzes network traffic in real-time, providing detailed insights into data packets and network behavior.
Pros
- + Open-source and free to use
- + Extensive protocol support and deep packet inspection
- + Active development and community support
- + User-friendly graphical interface
- + Cross-platform compatibility
- + Real-time network monitoring
- + Scripting and automation capabilities
Cons
- - Steep learning curve for new users
- - Can be resource-intensive for large captures