CrossPaste vs CopyClip
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
CrossPaste
8.0Universal Pasteboard Across Devices
CopyClip
6.5Clipboard manager
| Metric | CrossPaste | CopyClip |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Utilities |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 6.5 |
| 30-day Installs | 57 | 385 |
| 90-day Installs | 155 | 1.0K |
| 365-day Installs | 401 | 4.4K |
| Version | 2.0.0.2192 | 3.991 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 1.9K | 15 |
| GitHub Forks | 80 | - |
| Open Issues | 26 | 2 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Kotlin | Python |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1mo ago | 4mo ago |
| First Seen | Sep 3, 2024 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
CrossPaste
CrossPaste offers a universal clipboard experience, syncing text and images across devices and operating systems. Its key features include seamless cross-device pasteboard synchronization and support for multiple platforms, benefiting users who frequently switch between devices.
Synchronizes clipboard content across devices, enabling users to paste text or images anywhere.
Pros
- + Cross-device clipboard synchronization for seamless content sharing.
- + Open-source AGPL license promoting transparency and customization.
- + Active development with frequent updates and issue resolutions.
Cons
- - Known issues with Windows compatibility that require attention.
- - Manual updates required as there's no auto-update feature.
CopyClip
CopyClip is an open-source clipboard manager inspired by Windows 10's clipboard, offering cross-platform support and a simple interface for managing clipboard history. It benefits users who need quick access to frequently copied text or URLs.
Manages clipboard history, allowing users to store, organize, and quickly paste previously copied items.
Pros
- + Open-source with a permissive MIT license
- + Cross-platform support for Linux, macOS, and Windows
- + Actively maintained with regular updates
Cons
- - Limited community engagement and third-party reviews
- - Occasional bugs reported by users