CoRD vs Jump Desktop
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
CoRD
7.0Remote desktop client
Jump Desktop
6.0Remote desktop application
| Metric | CoRD | Jump Desktop |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Utilities |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 6.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 8 | 161 |
| 90-day Installs | 35 | 511 |
| 365-day Installs | 214 | 1.2K |
| Version | 0.5.7 | 9.1.9,90109 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 2 |
| GitHub Forks | — | - |
| Open Issues | — | - |
| License | — | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | — | C++ |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 7y ago |
| First Seen | Apr 17, 2013 | Oct 22, 2017 |
Reviews
CoRD
CoRD is a reliable remote desktop client for macOS, supporting multiple protocols and offering a clean, intuitive interface. It's ideal for users needing to connect to remote systems without the need for auto-updates.
CoRD acts as a remote desktop client, enabling users to connect to and control remote computers via various protocols.
Pros
- + Supports multiple remote desktop protocols (RDP, VNC, etc.)
- + Cross-platform compatibility, allowing connections from various operating systems
- + Clean and intuitive user interface
Cons
- - Manual updates required, no auto-update feature
- - Low install count suggests limited current usage or community support
Jump Desktop
Jump Desktop offers a comprehensive remote desktop experience with support for RDP, VNC, and Fluid protocols, making it ideal for users needing seamless access to multiple devices. Its performance and ease of use are highlighted in user reviews, though its inactive development status raises concerns.
Enables remote desktop access via various protocols, allowing users to connect to multiple devices.
Pros
- + Supports multiple remote access protocols (RDP, VNC, Fluid)
- + User-friendly interface with good performance
- + Positive feedback on ease of use and reliability
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - High cost relative to alternatives