Skip to content
cask.news
← Browse all apps

Container PS vs Docker Desktop

Side-by-side comparison for macOS

Container PS

6.0
Developer Tools

App to show all docker images

Docker Desktop

8.0
Developer Tools

App to build and share containerised applications and microservices

Metric Container PS Docker Desktop
Category Developer Tools Developer Tools
AI Score 6.0 8.0
30-day Installs 34 53.4K
90-day Installs 130 161.6K
365-day Installs 561 432.4K
Version 1.3.0 4.72.0,225998
Auto-updates No Yes
Deprecated Yes No
GitHub Stars 101 1.2K
GitHub Forks 14 282
Open Issues 6 27
License MIT
Language JavaScript Shell
Last GitHub Commit 3y ago 3y ago
First Seen Aug 9, 2023 Aug 9, 2023

Reviews

Container PS

Container PS is a macOS application that provides a graphical interface for managing Docker images, making it easier for developers to view and manage their containers. It offers a user-friendly approach to Docker image management, particularly beneficial for those who prefer a GUI over command-line tools.

Container PS displays and manages Docker images, allowing users to filter, view, and manage their images through a graphical user interface.

Pros

  • + Provides a graphical interface for Docker image management
  • + Open-source with an MIT license, fostering community contributions
  • + Cross-platform compatibility, beneficial for macOS users

Cons

  • - Lacks auto-update functionality, requiring manual checks for updates
  • - Limited community discussion and engagement

Docker Desktop

Docker Desktop is a powerful tool for building and sharing containerized applications and microservices. It offers a seamless environment for developers to work with Docker containers, enabling efficient workflows and collaboration.

Docker Desktop provides a platform for creating, managing, and sharing containerized applications and microservices.

Pros

  • + Strong community support and widespread adoption
  • + Essential tool for Docker workflows and containerization
  • + Integration with other Docker ecosystem tools

Cons

  • - Documentation issues and occasional feature gaps
  • - Dependence on Docker's ecosystem and associated costs