Clicker for YouTube vs Fluid
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Clicker for YouTube
6.0Standalone YouTube app
Fluid
6.0Tool to turn a website into a desktop app
| Metric | Clicker for YouTube | Fluid |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media & Design | Productivity |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 10 | 19 |
| 90-day Installs | 30 | 61 |
| 365-day Installs | 110 | 330 |
| Version | 1.22 | 2.1.2 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | — |
| GitHub Forks | — | — |
| Open Issues | — | — |
| License | — | — |
| Language | — | — |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | — |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2023 | Oct 14, 2012 |
Reviews
Clicker for YouTube
Clicker for YouTube offers a native macOS experience for YouTube with features like pip, ad blocking, and keyboard shortcuts. It’s designed for power users and content creators seeking a more interactive and customizable way to watch videos.
Provides a native YouTube experience on macOS with additional features like pip, ad blocking, and keyboard shortcuts.
Pros
- + Native macOS experience with YouTube functionality
- + Built-in ad blocker and pip support
- + Keyboard shortcuts and dark mode compatibility
- + Open-source and free to use
Cons
- - Limited recent updates and adoption
- - No mention of frequent community support or updates
Fluid
Fluid allows users to turn any website into a desktop application, offering a seamless experience for frequent website visitors. It is particularly beneficial for those who want to access web apps like Gmail or Twitter without relying on a browser, providing a lightweight and integrated macOS experience.
Fluid converts websites into desktop applications, allowing them to be used like native apps.
Pros
- + Lightweight and efficient for accessing web apps
- + Good macOS integration with features like app switching
- + Customizable URLs and keyboard shortcuts
Cons
- - No auto-update feature requiring manual checks
- - Limited customization options and features