Falstad CircuitJS vs LTspice
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Falstad CircuitJS
7.0Electronic circuit simulator
LTspice
8.0SPICE simulation software, schematic capture and waveform viewer
| Metric | Falstad CircuitJS | LTspice |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Education | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 8 | 98 |
| 90-day Installs | 30 | 281 |
| 365-day Installs | 106 | 1.1K |
| Version | 4.1.0js | 17.2.4 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 276 |
| GitHub Forks | — | 68 |
| Open Issues | — | - |
| License | — | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | — | Python |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 6mo ago |
| First Seen | Dec 25, 2020 | Mar 3, 2014 |
Reviews
Falstad CircuitJS
Falstad CircuitJS is a versatile browser-based electronic circuit simulator ideal for educators, students, and engineers. It allows users to design and simulate circuits, including logic gates, in a user-friendly interface. Its portability and ease of use make it a valuable tool for learning and prototyping without the need for installation.
Simulates electronic circuits and logic gates in the browser.
Pros
- + Runs directly in the browser without installation.
- + Supports a wide range of circuit components and configurations.
- + Educational-friendly interface with clear visualization of circuit behavior.
Cons
- - No auto-update feature, potentially limiting access to the latest features or bug fixes.
- - Dependent on browser performance for simulation, which may vary.
LTspice
LTspice is a powerful and widely-used SPICE simulation tool for analog circuit design, offering schematic capture, simulation, and waveform analysis. Its free availability and extensive features make it a favorite among engineers and hobbyists for circuit design and testing.
LTspice allows users to simulate analog circuits, create schematics, and analyze waveforms for circuit design and testing.
Pros
- + Free and widely adopted by engineers and hobbyists
- + Comprehensive features for circuit simulation and analysis
- + Active community and regular updates ensure reliability and support
Cons
- - No auto-update feature may require manual checks for new versions
- - While the GitHub community is active, there are few open issues, possibly indicating limited ongoing community contribution