Chrome Remote Desktop vs RustDesk
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Chrome Remote Desktop
7.0Remotely access another computer through the Google Chrome browser
RustDesk
8.0Open source virtual/remote desktop application
| Metric | Chrome Remote Desktop | RustDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Communication | Communication |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 174 | 2.7K |
| 90-day Installs | 612 | 8.3K |
| 365-day Installs | 1.9K | 21.2K |
| Version | 147.0.7727.3 | 1.4.6 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 16 | 109.0K |
| GitHub Forks | 10 | 16.2K |
| Open Issues | 1 | 99 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last GitHub Commit | 2y ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Apr 18, 2014 | May 28, 2022 |
Reviews
Chrome Remote Desktop
Chrome Remote Desktop allows users to remotely access and control another computer directly through the Google Chrome browser, eliminating the need for third-party software. Built using Electron.js, it offers a free and cross-platform solution for remote access, leveraging Google's infrastructure for secure connections.
Enables remote access and control of another computer using the Google Chrome browser.
Pros
- + Free and open-source under MIT license.
- + Cross-platform compatibility.
- + Integration with Google accounts for secure access.
- + No third-party software required for remote access.
Cons
- - Lacks auto-update functionality.
- - One open GitHub issue indicating potential bugs.
- - Resource-intensive due to Electron.js framework.
RustDesk
RustDesk is an open-source remote desktop application designed as a self-hosted alternative to TeamViewer. It offers secure, cross-platform remote access and control, making it ideal for users seeking privacy and flexibility.
Enables remote access and control of other computers, providing a secure and efficient alternative to proprietary solutions.
Pros
- + Open-source and self-hostable, ensuring privacy and control
- + Written in Rust, offering performance and security advantages
- + Active and large community with high GitHub engagement
- + Regular updates and strong development activity
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Potential privacy concerns with Chinese root certificates