Charles vs Wireshark
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Charles
8.0Web debugging Proxy application
Wireshark
9.0Network protocol analyzer
| Metric | Charles | Wireshark |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 9.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 661 | 4.5K |
| 90-day Installs | 1.8K | 12.8K |
| 365-day Installs | 6.5K | 47.8K |
| Version | 5.1 | 4.6.5 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 429 | 9.1K |
| GitHub Forks | 34 | 2.1K |
| Open Issues | 5 | 2 |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Kotlin | C |
| Last GitHub Commit | 7y ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Jun 9, 2013 | Aug 14, 2013 |
Reviews
Charles
Charles is a powerful web debugging proxy that allows developers to inspect and manipulate HTTP and HTTPS traffic. Its ability to capture and modify network requests makes it essential for developers working on web applications.
Charles captures and manipulates HTTP and HTTPS traffic for debugging web applications.
Pros
- + Comprehensive debugging capabilities
- + Support for multiple platforms
- + Ability to modify network requests
Cons
- - Lack of auto-updates
- - Limited recent GitHub activity
Wireshark
Wireshark is a powerful network protocol analyzer used for debugging and analyzing network traffic. It supports a wide range of protocols and offers both graphical and command-line interfaces, making it a versatile tool for developers and network administrators.
Wireshark captures and analyzes network traffic in real-time, providing detailed insights into data packets and network behavior.
Pros
- + Open-source and free to use
- + Extensive protocol support and deep packet inspection
- + Active development and community support
- + User-friendly graphical interface
- + Cross-platform compatibility
- + Real-time network monitoring
- + Scripting and automation capabilities
Cons
- - Steep learning curve for new users
- - Can be resource-intensive for large captures