Catch vs Stash
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Catch
7.0Broadcatching made easy
Stash
7.0Network tool based on Clash
| Metric | Catch | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Utilities |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 6 | 127 |
| 90-day Installs | 22 | 333 |
| 365-day Installs | 182 | 852 |
| Version | 2.3 | 4.2.0,467 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 435 | 12.0K |
| GitHub Forks | 41 | 1.0K |
| Open Issues | 12 | 800 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Swift | Go |
| Last GitHub Commit | 2y ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Nov 15, 2013 | Feb 27, 2026 |
Reviews
Catch
Catch simplifies broadcatching on macOS, making it easy to aggregate and manage content from various sources. Its key features include streamlined content discovery and management, benefiting users who need efficient content aggregation tools.
Catch simplifies the process of broadcatching, allowing users to aggregate and manage content from multiple sources efficiently.
Pros
- + Simplifies the process of broadcatching for users
- + Actively maintained with auto-update functionality
- + Developed in Swift for compatibility and performance
Cons
- - Limited community discussion or buzz
- - Some issues mentioned, though they appear resolved
Stash
Stash is a network tool based on Clash, offering proxy and network management features. It uniquely serves as an organizer for specific content, benefiting users seeking both network tools and content organization.
Stash is a network tool based on Clash, providing proxy capabilities and content organization features.
Pros
- + Open-source with AGPL-3.0 license, allowing modifications and distribution.
- + Active development evidenced by recent commits.
- + Niche functionality for content organization, appealing to specific users.
Cons
- - High number of open issues may indicate potential bugs or unaddressed feature requests.
- - Niche focus limits broader appeal.