Broadcast Using This Tool vs Streamlabs Desktop
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Broadcast Using This Tool
6.5Shoutcast and Icecast streaming client
Streamlabs Desktop
8.0All-in-one live streaming software
| Metric | Broadcast Using This Tool | Streamlabs Desktop |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media & Design | Media & Design |
| AI Score | 6.5 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 18 | 66 |
| 90-day Installs | 41 | 211 |
| 365-day Installs | 135 | 993 |
| Version | 1.46.0 | 1.20.7 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 4.8K |
| GitHub Forks | — | 681 |
| Open Issues | — | 46 |
| License | — | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | — | TypeScript |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2023 | Apr 5, 2020 |
Reviews
Broadcast Using This Tool
Broadcast Using This Tool (butt) is a streaming client designed for broadcasting audio to Shoutcast and Icecast servers. It offers features like multiple encoder support, stream monitoring, and compatibility with various audio sources, making it ideal for content creators and podcasters.
Streams audio content to Shoutcast and Icecast servers.
Pros
- + Supports multiple audio encoders and formats.
- + Provides detailed monitoring of stream status and statistics.
- + Compatible with major streaming services like Shoutcast and Icecast.
Cons
- - Lacks auto-update functionality.
- - User interface may feel outdated compared to modern applications.
Streamlabs Desktop
Streamlabs Desktop is a powerful all-in-one live streaming software built on OBS and Electron, offering features like scene transitions, overlays, and platform integrations. It's ideal for content creators looking for a free, open-source solution to manage and enhance their streams.
Streamlabs Desktop provides tools for creating, managing, and enhancing live streams.
Pros
- + Free and open-source with a strong community backing
- + Built on OBS, ensuring reliability and a robust foundation
- + Active development and regular updates
Cons
- - Electron-based, which may impact performance
- - Niche compared to mainstream alternatives