Bruno vs inso
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Bruno
8.5Open source IDE for exploring and testing APIs
inso
8.0CLI HTTP and GraphQL Client
| Metric | Bruno | inso |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 8.5 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 5.4K | 51 |
| 90-day Installs | 17.3K | 162 |
| 365-day Installs | 88.9K | 625 |
| Version | 3.3.0 | 12.5.0 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 41.6K | 38.0K |
| GitHub Forks | 2.2K | 2.2K |
| Open Issues | 1.8K | 817 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Feb 24, 2023 | Oct 31, 2021 |
Reviews
Bruno
Bruno is an open-source IDE for exploring and testing APIs, offering a fast and Git-friendly alternative to tools like Postman and Insomnia. It's ideal for developers who value performance, integration with version control, and a lightweight API testing experience.
Bruno provides a platform for developers to explore, test, and document APIs efficiently.
Pros
- + Open-source and MIT licensed, offering flexibility and transparency.
- + Git-friendly with support for version control integration.
- + Fast performance and lightweight compared to alternatives.
- + Cross-platform compatibility.
- + Strong community support and active development.
Cons
- - A steep learning curve due to its open-source nature.
- - A large number of open issues may indicate areas needing attention.
inso
Inso is a powerful command-line client for interacting with HTTP, GraphQL, and other API protocols. It supports cloud, local, and Git storage, making it ideal for developers who need a flexible and feature-rich tool for API testing and management.
Inso is a CLI tool that enables interaction with HTTP, GraphQL, and other API protocols.
Pros
- + Supports multiple API protocols including HTTP, GraphQL, WebSockets, SSE, and gRPC.
- + Offers flexible storage options with cloud, local, and Git support.
- + Actively maintained with a strong community presence.
Cons
- - Command-line interface may be challenging for non-technical users.
- - Previous account requirement issue, though resolved.