Bluefish vs Emacs
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Bluefish
4.0Open source code editor
Emacs
9.0Text editor
| Metric | Bluefish | Emacs |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 4.0 | 9.0 |
| 30-day Installs | - | 2.0K |
| 90-day Installs | 28 | 6.3K |
| 365-day Installs | 198 | 25.0K |
| Version | 2.4.1 | 30.2-1 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | 6 | 5.0K |
| GitHub Forks | 2 | 1.4K |
| Open Issues | 1 | 17 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | Emacs Lisp |
| Last GitHub Commit | 10y ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Dec 18, 2016 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
Bluefish
Bluefish is an open-source code editor that allows developers to create and edit code diagrams using components. It is particularly useful for those who need to visualize code structures and relationships, making it beneficial for developers working on complex projects.
Bluefish enables users to create and edit code diagrams using components, providing a visual representation of code structures.
Pros
- + Open-source and free to use
- + Supports code diagramming for visualizing code structures
- + Potentially useful for developers working on complex projects
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Low community activity and engagement
- - Potential stability issues on macOS
Emacs
Emacs is a highly customizable and powerful text editor favored by developers and power users. Its extensibility through Emacs Lisp and vast package ecosystem make it a versatile tool for various tasks. It benefits those who need a flexible and feature-rich editor.
Emacs is a text editor with a built-in Lisp-based customization layer, allowing extensive configuration.
Pros
- + Highly customizable and extensible through Emacs Lisp
- + Large and active community with extensive package ecosystem
- + Cross-platform support with consistent functionality
Cons
- - Steep learning curve for new users
- - Resource-intensive, especially with many plugins