BlueBubbles vs Signal
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
BlueBubbles
7.5Server for forwarding iMessages
Signal
8.0Instant messaging application focusing on security
| Metric | BlueBubbles | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Communication | Communication |
| AI Score | 7.5 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 2.7K | 2.8K |
| 90-day Installs | 11.2K | 9.4K |
| 365-day Installs | 15.5K | 35.4K |
| Version | 1.9.9 | 8.8.0 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | 857 | 28.4K |
| GitHub Forks | 103 | 6.7K |
| Open Issues | 81 | 476 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Kotlin |
| Last GitHub Commit | 3mo ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Sep 4, 2022 | Nov 1, 2017 |
Reviews
BlueBubbles
BlueBubbles is a unique server application that enables forwarding iMessages to multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, and Android. It allows users to extend iMessage functionality beyond Apple devices, making it ideal for those seeking cross-platform messaging capabilities.
BlueBubbles forwards iMessages to clients within its ecosystem, enabling access on various platforms.
Pros
- + Enables iMessage access on Windows, Linux, and Android
- + Self-hosting capability for greater control
- + Free and open-source with an Apache-2.0 license
Cons
- - No auto-updates feature
- - Some users report setup challenges
Signal
Signal is a privacy-focused instant messaging app with end-to-end encryption, designed for secure communication. It supports text, voice, and video calls, benefiting users who prioritize security and anonymity.
Signal provides secure, encrypted messaging and communication services for text, voice, and video calls.
Pros
- + End-to-end encryption ensures secure communication
- + User-friendly interface with strong privacy features
- + Regular updates and active development
Cons
- - Persistent issues with call functionality
- - Lack of desktop app features like read receipts
- - MacOS app is a web wrapper, not a native experience