blip vs Flying Carpet
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
blip
8.0Send any size file between devices
Flying Carpet
7.0File transfer over ad-hoc wifi
| Metric | blip | Flying Carpet |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Communication | Utilities |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 380 | 9 |
| 90-day Installs | 850 | 19 |
| 365-day Installs | 2.6K | 92 |
| Version | 1.1.16,20260425132215 | 9.0.4,9.0.0 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 5.7K | 5.0K |
| GitHub Forks | 762 | 235 |
| Open Issues | 135 | 19 |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Jupyter Notebook | Rust |
| Last GitHub Commit | 2mo ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Jul 7, 2024 | Aug 31, 2020 |
Reviews
blip
Blip is a peer-to-peer file-sharing app that allows users to send files of any size securely and instantly across devices. It stands out for its encryption, cross-platform compatibility, and unlimited file size support, making it ideal for both casual users and developers needing robust file transfer solutions.
Enables secure, instant, and unlimited file transfers between devices using peer-to-peer technology.
Pros
- + Secure and encrypted file transfers
- + Supports files of any size without restrictions
- + Cross-platform compatibility
- + Instant and peer-to-peer functionality
- + Free to use
- + No size limitations
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Some technical issues in the underlying library
Flying Carpet
Flying Carpet is a cross-platform file transfer application that enables encrypted sharing over ad-hoc Wi-Fi without requiring a network infrastructure. It supports multiple operating systems, including macOS, iOS, Android, Linux, and Windows, making it ideal for users who need seamless file sharing between devices in close proximity.
Enables encrypted file transfer between devices over ad-hoc Wi-Fi without requiring a network infrastructure.
Pros
- + Cross-platform support for multiple operating systems.
- + Encrypted file transfer ensures data security.
- + No network infrastructure required for operation.
Cons
- - Limited recent installs suggest lower adoption rates.
- - Past issues with Android installation and functionality.