Bitwarden vs LastPass
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Bitwarden
7.5Desktop password and login vault
LastPass
8.0Password manager
| Metric | Bitwarden | LastPass |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security & Privacy | Security & Privacy |
| AI Score | 7.5 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 4.4K | 92 |
| 90-day Installs | 13.1K | 242 |
| 365-day Installs | 56.2K | 1.2K |
| Version | 2026.10.0 | 4.116.0 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 12.5K | — |
| GitHub Forks | 1.7K | — |
| Open Issues | 1.1K | — |
| License | NOASSERTION | — |
| Language | TypeScript | — |
| Last GitHub Commit | 7mo ago | — |
| First Seen | Feb 17, 2018 | Nov 30, 2014 |
Reviews
Bitwarden
Bitwarden is a popular, open-source password manager offering a secure and user-friendly vault for passwords and logins. It supports cross-platform use and integrates seamlessly with browsers and devices, making it ideal for anyone seeking robust password management.
Bitwarden serves as a desktop application for securely storing and managing passwords and login credentials.
Pros
- + Open-source and community-driven
- + Cross-platform support
- + Browser extension integration
- + Active development and frequent updates
- + Strong security features
Cons
- - Occasional user interface issues
- - Browser extension can be buggy
LastPass
LastPass is a comprehensive password manager offering secure storage, autofill capabilities, and multi-device synchronization. It benefits users seeking a robust solution for managing and protecting their login credentials.
LastPass securely stores and autofills passwords, providing a centralized solution for password management.
Pros
- + Secure storage of passwords and sensitive information
- + Convenient autofill feature across websites and applications
- + Support for browser extensions and multi-device synchronization
Cons
- - Subscription model may be costly for some users
- - History of security vulnerabilities has raised concerns