Berrycast vs Kap
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Berrycast
4.5Screen recorder
Kap
8.0Open-source screen recorder built with web technology
| Metric | Berrycast | Kap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media & Design | Media & Design |
| AI Score | 4.5 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 4 | 570 |
| 90-day Installs | 14 | 1.8K |
| 365-day Installs | 55 | 5.8K |
| Version | 0.39.4 | 3.6.0 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 5 | 19.1K |
| GitHub Forks | - | 870 |
| Open Issues | - | 246 |
| License | — | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last GitHub Commit | 5y ago | 1y ago |
| First Seen | Dec 5, 2020 | Oct 6, 2016 |
Reviews
Berrycast
Berrycast is a niche screen recorder designed for streaming Android devices to an HDMI display using a Raspberry Pi. While it offers a free and open-source solution for this specific use case, its lack of updates and community engagement raise concerns about its reliability and longevity.
Streams Android devices to an HDMI display via Raspberry Pi.
Pros
- + Free and open-source
- + Simple setup for Raspberry Pi streaming
- + No cost to users
Cons
- - No auto-updates or maintenance
- - Very niche use case with limited appeal
Kap
Kap is an open-source screen recorder built using web technology, offering a modern and lightweight alternative for content creators and developers. It provides features like screen recording, video editing, and export options, making it a useful tool for those needing simple yet effective screen capture solutions.
Kap records screen activity and allows users to edit and export videos.
Pros
- + Open-source and built with modern web technologies
- + Cross-platform support
- + Lightweight and user-friendly interface
Cons
- - Known issues with the latest macOS versions
- - Limited customization options