Aquamacs vs Sublime Text
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Aquamacs
6.5Text editor based on GNU Emacs
Sublime Text
8.0Text editor for code, markup and prose
| Metric | Aquamacs | Sublime Text |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 6.5 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 14 | 5.8K |
| 90-day Installs | 49 | 16.2K |
| 365-day Installs | 310 | 62.4K |
| Version | 3.6 | 4200 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 420 | 856 |
| GitHub Forks | 41 | 43 |
| Open Issues | 64 | 2.0K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Language | Emacs Lisp | — |
| Last GitHub Commit | 2mo ago | 3y ago |
| First Seen | Oct 14, 2012 | Sep 22, 2012 |
Reviews
Aquamacs
Aquamacs is a macOS-optimized Emacs editor, offering a powerful text editing experience with native Cocoa integration. It's ideal for developers working with Lisp, Ruby on Rails, and other programming tasks who appreciate Emacs' flexibility and want a more Mac-like experience.
Aquamacs provides a feature-rich text editing environment based on GNU Emacs, tailored for macOS users.
Pros
- + Native macOS integration with Cocoa
- + Highly customizable and extensible
- + Strong support for Lisp and Ruby on Rails development
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Some lingering issues reported in older versions
Sublime Text
Sublime Text is a high-performance text editor known for its speed, customizability, and extensive plugin ecosystem. It supports coding, markup, and prose, making it ideal for developers and writers alike.
Sublime Text is a versatile text editor that supports coding, markup, and prose writing.
Pros
- + High-speed performance and responsiveness
- + Extensive plugin and theme support for customization
- + Cross-platform availability
Cons
- - Not open-source
- - Steep learning curve for new users