AppGate SDP Client for macOS vs Tunnelblick
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
AppGate SDP Client for macOS
7.0Software-defined perimeter for secure network access
Tunnelblick
7.0Free and open-source OpenVPN client
| Metric | AppGate SDP Client for macOS | Tunnelblick |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security & Privacy | Security & Privacy |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 20 | 1.2K |
| 90-day Installs | 50 | 3.5K |
| 365-day Installs | 209 | 13.6K |
| Version | 6.6.0 | 8.0.1,6301 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 3.2K |
| GitHub Forks | — | 355 |
| Open Issues | — | 62 |
| License | — | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | — | Objective-C |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 3mo ago |
| First Seen | Oct 14, 2017 | May 21, 2013 |
Reviews
AppGate SDP Client for macOS
AppGate SDP Client provides secure network access using a software-defined perimeter, offering a zero-trust model for enhanced security. It integrates with existing security tools, making it ideal for enterprises seeking robust network protection.
Secures network access using software-defined perimeter technology to ensure only authorized users and devices can connect.
Pros
- + Zero-trust security model enhances network protection
- + Integrates with existing security tools for seamless deployment
- + Platform-agnostic, supporting diverse environments
Cons
- - No auto-update feature requires manual checks
- - Limited user base may result in less community support
Tunnelblick
Tunnelblick is a reliable, free, and open-source OpenVPN client for macOS, offering users a secure and versatile way to connect to VPN servers. Its long-standing presence and active maintenance make it a trusted choice for those seeking a robust VPN solution.
Tunnelblick allows users to establish secure VPN connections using OpenVPN technology.
Pros
- + Free and open-source, promoting transparency and cost-effectiveness.
- + Long-standing and actively maintained, ensuring reliability and security.
- + Versatile configuration options for various VPN needs.
Cons
- - Historical security vulnerabilities, though addressed, may raise concerns.
- - Complex configuration process for some users.