Skip to content
cask.news
← Browse all apps

AirServer vs Airfoil

Side-by-side comparison for macOS

AirServer

5.0
Media & Design

Screen mirroring receiver

Airfoil

8.0
Media & Design

Sends audio from computer to outputs

Metric AirServer Airfoil
Category Media & Design Media & Design
AI Score 5.0 8.0
30-day Installs 34 48
90-day Installs 112 161
365-day Installs 396 626
Version 7.2.7 5.12.6
Auto-updates Yes Yes
Deprecated No No
GitHub Stars 103
GitHub Forks 8
Open Issues 2
License MIT
Language JavaScript
Last GitHub Commit 10y ago
First Seen Nov 9, 2013 May 6, 2013

Reviews

AirServer

AirServer is a dedicated screen mirroring receiver that supports AirPlay and Google Cast, offering advanced features for developers and users needing to mirror iOS devices to their Mac. Its auto-update feature ensures users stay current, though its last GitHub update in 2015 raises concerns about maintenance.

AirServer acts as a screen mirroring receiver, enabling users to mirror content from iOS devices to their Mac.

Pros

  • + Advanced screen mirroring capabilities for AirPlay and Google Cast.
  • + Auto-updates ensure users receive the latest features and security patches.
  • + MIT license offers permissive open-source terms.

Cons

  • - No recent updates or activity on GitHub since 2015.
  • - Open issues regarding maintenance and iOS compatibility.

Airfoil

Airfoil is a powerful audio streaming tool that allows users to send audio from their computer to various outputs, including AirPlay devices, networked computers, and more. Its ability to support multiple audio streams simultaneously and deliver high-quality sound makes it a favorite among audiophiles and media professionals.

Airfoil streams audio from your computer to multiple devices, including AirPlay speakers, networked computers, and more.

Pros

  • + Seamless audio streaming to multiple devices simultaneously
  • + Support for a wide range of audio output options, including AirPlay and networked computers
  • + High-quality audio delivery with advanced customization options

Cons

  • - Requires a paid license after the trial period
  • - Can be overwhelming for users with simpler audio needs