Advanced REST Client vs Bruno
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Advanced REST Client
8.0API testing tool
Bruno
8.5Open source IDE for exploring and testing APIs
| Metric | Advanced REST Client | Bruno |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 8.5 |
| 30-day Installs | 6 | 5.4K |
| 90-day Installs | 27 | 17.3K |
| 365-day Installs | 142 | 88.9K |
| Version | 17.0.9 | 3.3.0 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 1.5K | 41.6K |
| GitHub Forks | 233 | 2.2K |
| Open Issues | 58 | 1.8K |
| License | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last GitHub Commit | 2mo ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Apr 12, 2019 | Feb 24, 2023 |
Reviews
Advanced REST Client
Advanced REST Client is a powerful API testing tool that allows developers to send HTTP requests, view responses, and manage API collections. Its user-friendly interface and support for multiple request methods make it ideal for developers and API testers seeking a robust desktop solution.
The app enables users to test and debug APIs by sending requests and viewing responses, facilitating efficient API development and troubleshooting.
Pros
- + Open-source and community-driven.
- + Supports a wide range of HTTP methods and request types.
- + Intuitive interface for managing API requests and responses.
Cons
- - No auto-update feature, requiring manual checks for updates.
- - Some open issues may affect certain functionalities.
Bruno
Bruno is an open-source IDE for exploring and testing APIs, offering a fast and Git-friendly alternative to tools like Postman and Insomnia. It's ideal for developers who value performance, integration with version control, and a lightweight API testing experience.
Bruno provides a platform for developers to explore, test, and document APIs efficiently.
Pros
- + Open-source and MIT licensed, offering flexibility and transparency.
- + Git-friendly with support for version control integration.
- + Fast performance and lightweight compared to alternatives.
- + Cross-platform compatibility.
- + Strong community support and active development.
Cons
- - A steep learning curve due to its open-source nature.
- - A large number of open issues may indicate areas needing attention.