XQuartz vs OrbStack
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
XQuartz
7.0Open-source version of the X.Org X Window System
OrbStack
8.5Replacement for Docker Desktop
| Metric | XQuartz | OrbStack |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 8.5 |
| 30-day Installs | 6.9K | 21.7K |
| 90-day Installs | 21.8K | 56.1K |
| 365-day Installs | 97.8K | 137.2K |
| Version | 2.8.5 | 2.1.1,20026 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 996 | 8.2K |
| GitHub Forks | 69 | 84 |
| Open Issues | 83 | 446 |
| License | — | MIT |
| Language | Shell | Shell |
| Last GitHub Commit | 2y ago | 8mo ago |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2023 | Mar 24, 2023 |
Reviews
XQuartz
XQuartz provides essential X11 support for macOS, enabling developers to use Unix-based tools. While it supports Apple Silicon and is actively maintained, it faces some performance and compatibility issues.
XQuartz acts as an X11 server and client libraries for macOS, facilitating the use of Unix graphical applications.
Pros
- + Supports Apple Silicon
- + Actively maintained
- + Widely used by developers
Cons
- - Performance issues with macOS
- - Unresolved bugs
OrbStack
OrbStack is a lightweight and fast alternative to Docker Desktop, designed for macOS users who need simple containerization without the overhead of traditional solutions. It offers an easy-to-use interface for running Linux machines and Docker containers, making it ideal for developers seeking a streamlined workflow.
OrbStack provides a fast and simple solution for running Docker containers and Linux machines on macOS.
Pros
- + Lightweight and fast performance
- + Seamless integration with existing development workflows
- + Active and engaged developer community
- + Support for running Linux VMs on macOS
Cons
- - High number of open GitHub issues
- - Primarily developed in Shell, which may limit accessibility for some users