Xpra vs Windows App
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Xpra
7.5Screen and application forwarding system
Windows App
6.0Connect to Windows
| Metric | Xpra | Windows App |
|---|---|---|
| Category | System Tools | Utilities |
| AI Score | 7.5 | 6.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 180 | 2.9K |
| 90-day Installs | 547 | 7.1K |
| 365-day Installs | 2.0K | 24.0K |
| Version | 6.4.3,0 | 11.3.5 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | 2.7K | 225 |
| GitHub Forks | 221 | 22 |
| Open Issues | 309 | - |
| License | GPL-2.0 | — |
| Language | Python | Rust |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1mo ago | 3y ago |
| First Seen | Jun 27, 2015 | Sep 22, 2024 |
Reviews
Xpra
Xpra enables screen and application forwarding across different platforms, allowing users to remotely access and resume applications without losing their sessions. It's particularly useful for developers and system administrators who need persistent remote application access.
Forwards applications and screens, enabling remote access and resumption of sessions.
Pros
- + Cross-platform support for X11, macOS, and Windows
- + Persistent remote application sessions that can be resumed
- + Open-source with active community contributions
Cons
- - Lack of auto-updates for the Homebrew cask
- - Complex setup may deter less experienced users
Windows App
Windows App is a tool for macOS users to connect and interact with Windows systems or services. It offers a bridge to access Windows-specific features, benefiting users who need cross-platform functionality. The app is built using Rust, emphasizing performance and security.
Enables macOS users to connect to and interact with Windows systems or services.
Pros
- + Provides connectivity to Windows systems for macOS users
- + Open-source with a focus on Rust for security and performance
- + Potentially useful for users needing cross-platform interaction
Cons
- - Lack of auto-updates may lead to outdated features or security risks
- - Inactive project with no recent commits or open issues