Windsurf vs Cursor
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Windsurf
7.0Agentic IDE powered by AI Flow paradigm
Cursor
7.5Write, edit, and chat about your code with AI
| Metric | Windsurf | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 7.5 |
| 30-day Installs | 1.1K | 11.3K |
| 90-day Installs | 2.9K | 34.7K |
| 365-day Installs | 15.9K | 133.3K |
| Version | 2.1.32,63e54ba26dd2a1b975c172966dff80bad8ae74c7 | 3.2.21,806df57ed3b6f1ee0175140d38039a38574ec722 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 234 | 32.4K |
| GitHub Forks | 74 | 2.2K |
| Open Issues | 81 | 1 |
| License | MIT | — |
| Language | C# | — |
| Last GitHub Commit | 5mo ago | 3mo ago |
| First Seen | Nov 28, 2024 | Mar 30, 2023 |
Reviews
Windsurf
Windsurf is an AI-powered IDE that offers a unique approach to coding through its AI Flow paradigm, providing developers with intelligent assistance and automating tasks to enhance productivity. It is particularly beneficial for developers looking to streamline their workflow with AI-driven features.
Windsurf is an IDE that leverages AI to assist with coding tasks, offering features like code generation and intelligent suggestions.
Pros
- + AI-powered assistance enhances coding efficiency
- + Unique approach to integrating AI in development tools
- + Active development with regular updates
Cons
- - Some instability issues reported
- - Open bugs affecting functionality
Cursor
Cursor is an AI-powered code editor that enables developers to write, edit, and collaborate on code with real-time AI suggestions and chat features. It stands out for its unique combination of AI-driven code assistance and team collaboration capabilities, making it a valuable tool for developers seeking enhanced productivity and feedback.
Cursor is an AI-powered code editor that provides real-time code suggestions, editing, and collaboration features.
Pros
- + AI-driven code suggestions and real-time feedback enhance productivity
- + Collaboration features allow for team coding and brainstorming
- + Strong community and developer interest as evidenced by GitHub stats
Cons
- - Occasional bugs and reliability issues reported by users
- - Negative press mentions regarding security and user experience