Transmit vs ForkLift
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Transmit
8.0File transfer application
ForkLift
8.0Finder replacement and FTP, SFTP, WebDAV and Amazon s3 client
| Metric | Transmit | ForkLift |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Utilities |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 334 | 382 |
| 90-day Installs | 1.1K | 1.2K |
| 365-day Installs | 4.2K | 4.7K |
| Version | 5.11.6 | 4.6.1 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 189 |
| GitHub Forks | — | 204 |
| Open Issues | — | 60 |
| License | — | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | — | Shell |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 2mo ago |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2023 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
Transmit
Transmit is a feature-rich file transfer application designed for efficient uploading, downloading, and management of files across various servers and cloud storage services. Its user-friendly interface, support for multiple protocols, and integration with cloud services make it a valuable tool for professionals and developers who need reliable file transfer capabilities.
Transmit enables users to transfer files using protocols like FTP, SFTP, and WebDAV, as well as manage cloud storage services.
Pros
- + User-friendly interface with a polished design.
- + Support for multiple file transfer protocols and cloud integration.
- + Regular updates and active development.
Cons
- - Higher price point compared to competitors.
- - May lack some advanced features found in alternatives like Cyberduck.
ForkLift
ForkLift is a powerful Finder replacement and file transfer client that supports FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, and Amazon S3. It offers a modern interface for file management and syncing with cloud storage, making it ideal for users who need robust file transfer capabilities.
ForkLift acts as a file manager and client for various file transfer protocols, including FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, and Amazon S3.
Pros
- + Modern Finder replacement with advanced features
- + Supports multiple file transfer protocols
- + Cloud storage integration capabilities
- + Auto-updates keep the software current
- + Active development and maintenance
Cons
- - May have a steep learning curve for new users
- - Occasional bugs reported in the issue tracker