The low-tech guys Cling vs Path Finder
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
The low-tech guys Cling
7.0Instant fuzzy finder for files including system and hidden files
Path Finder
7.0File manager
| Metric | The low-tech guys Cling | Path Finder |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Utilities |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 91 | 91 |
| 90-day Installs | 242 | 272 |
| 365-day Installs | 606 | 1.1K |
| Version | 2.3.0 | 11.2 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 367 |
| GitHub Forks | — | 32 |
| Open Issues | — | 2 |
| License | — | — |
| Language | — | C++ |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 4y ago |
| First Seen | Aug 6, 2025 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
The low-tech guys Cling
Cling is a sleek macOS app that offers a quick and efficient way to search for files, including hidden and system files. Its fuzzy search functionality makes it ideal for users who need to locate files rapidly, offering a seamless experience for power users and developers alike.
Cling provides an instant fuzzy search feature to quickly locate files across your system, including hidden and system files.
Pros
- + Efficient fuzzy search functionality
- + Includes hidden and system files in search results
- + Lightweight and well-integrated with macOS
Cons
- - Niche appeal may limit its user base
- - Basic interface compared to more advanced alternatives
Path Finder
Path Finder is a powerful macOS file manager that leverages GPU acceleration for fast performance, making it ideal for handling large files and directories. It offers features like tabbed browsing, support for APFS, and a modern interface, benefiting designers, developers, and power users needing efficient file management.
Path Finder is a file manager optimized for speed and efficiency, utilizing GPU acceleration to handle large volumes of files and directories effectively.
Pros
- + Fast GPU-based file rendering for improved performance
- + Support for APFS and advanced macOS file system features
- + Tabbed interface for efficient workflow management
Cons
- - High memory usage on older systems
- - Occasional stability issues reported in GitHub issues