TeamViewer QuickSupport vs RustDesk
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
TeamViewer QuickSupport
7.0Remote support for computers and mobile devices
RustDesk
8.0Open source virtual/remote desktop application
| Metric | TeamViewer QuickSupport | RustDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Communication |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 71 | 2.7K |
| 90-day Installs | 166 | 8.3K |
| 365-day Installs | 456 | 21.2K |
| Version | 15 | 1.4.6 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 109.0K |
| GitHub Forks | — | 16.2K |
| Open Issues | — | 99 |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | — | Rust |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Apr 26, 2017 | May 28, 2022 |
Reviews
TeamViewer QuickSupport
TeamViewer QuickSupport offers a straightforward solution for remote device assistance, ideal for tech support teams and individuals needing to help others troubleshoot issues. Its ease of use and multi-platform support make it a reliable tool for quick problem-solving.
Enables remote access to devices for support purposes.
Pros
- + Easy to use for both senders and receivers of support.
- + Supports multiple platforms including computers and mobile devices.
- + Provides secure remote access with built-in encryption.
Cons
- - No auto-update feature, requiring manual checks for updates.
- - Requires an internet connection for functionality.
RustDesk
RustDesk is an open-source remote desktop application designed as a self-hosted alternative to TeamViewer. It offers secure, cross-platform remote access and control, making it ideal for users seeking privacy and flexibility.
Enables remote access and control of other computers, providing a secure and efficient alternative to proprietary solutions.
Pros
- + Open-source and self-hostable, ensuring privacy and control
- + Written in Rust, offering performance and security advantages
- + Active and large community with high GitHub engagement
- + Regular updates and strong development activity
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Potential privacy concerns with Chinese root certificates