Secretive vs MacPass
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Secretive
8.5Store SSH keys in the Secure Enclave
MacPass
8.0Open-source, KeePass-client and password manager
| Metric | Secretive | MacPass |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security & Privacy | Security & Privacy |
| AI Score | 8.5 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 413 | 125 |
| 90-day Installs | 1.2K | 356 |
| 365-day Installs | 3.9K | 1.7K |
| Version | 3.0.4 | 0.8.1 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 8.2K | 6.8K |
| GitHub Forks | 192 | 469 |
| Open Issues | 160 | 292 |
| License | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Language | Swift | Objective-C |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1mo ago | 1y ago |
| First Seen | Jun 10, 2020 | Oct 31, 2013 |
Reviews
Secretive
Secretive securely stores SSH keys in your Mac's Secure Enclave, offering an extra layer of protection for developers and security-conscious users. It integrates seamlessly with macOS, ensuring your keys are protected by hardware-level security.
Stores SSH keys in the Mac's Secure Enclave for enhanced security.
Pros
- + Secure storage using the Secure Enclave
- + Seamless integration with macOS
- + Open-source with active community support
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Some open issues that need addressing
MacPass
MacPass is a native macOS KeePass client and password manager that offers a secure and open-source solution for managing passwords. It integrates seamlessly with KeePass databases, providing a user-friendly experience for password management on macOS.
MacPass is a password manager that allows users to securely store, organize, and manage their passwords using KeePass database files.
Pros
- + Open-source and secure password management solution
- + Native macOS integration for a smooth user experience
- + Supports KeePass databases for seamless import and compatibility
Cons
- - High number of open issues may indicate areas needing attention
- - Lack of broader community engagement beyond GitHub