Secretive vs Bitwarden
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Secretive
8.5Store SSH keys in the Secure Enclave
Bitwarden
7.5Desktop password and login vault
| Metric | Secretive | Bitwarden |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security & Privacy | Security & Privacy |
| AI Score | 8.5 | 7.5 |
| 30-day Installs | 413 | 5.2K |
| 90-day Installs | 1.2K | 15.2K |
| 365-day Installs | 3.9K | 50.9K |
| Version | 3.0.4 | 2026.3.1 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 8.2K | 12.5K |
| GitHub Forks | 192 | 1.7K |
| Open Issues | 160 | 1.1K |
| License | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Language | Swift | TypeScript |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Jun 10, 2020 | Feb 17, 2018 |
Reviews
Secretive
Secretive securely stores SSH keys in your Mac's Secure Enclave, offering an extra layer of protection for developers and security-conscious users. It integrates seamlessly with macOS, ensuring your keys are protected by hardware-level security.
Stores SSH keys in the Mac's Secure Enclave for enhanced security.
Pros
- + Secure storage using the Secure Enclave
- + Seamless integration with macOS
- + Open-source with active community support
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Some open issues that need addressing
Bitwarden
Bitwarden is a popular, open-source password manager offering a secure and user-friendly vault for passwords and logins. It supports cross-platform use and integrates seamlessly with browsers and devices, making it ideal for anyone seeking robust password management.
Bitwarden serves as a desktop application for securely storing and managing passwords and login credentials.
Pros
- + Open-source and community-driven
- + Cross-platform support
- + Browser extension integration
- + Active development and frequent updates
- + Strong security features
Cons
- - Occasional user interface issues
- - Browser extension can be buggy