RustDesk vs Chrome Remote Desktop
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
RustDesk
8.0Open source virtual/remote desktop application
Chrome Remote Desktop
7.0Remotely access another computer through the Google Chrome browser
| Metric | RustDesk | Chrome Remote Desktop |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Communication | Communication |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 2.7K | 174 |
| 90-day Installs | 8.3K | 612 |
| 365-day Installs | 21.2K | 1.9K |
| Version | 1.4.6 | 147.0.7727.3 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 109.0K | 16 |
| GitHub Forks | 16.2K | 10 |
| Open Issues | 99 | 1 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Rust | JavaScript |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1mo ago | 2y ago |
| First Seen | May 28, 2022 | Apr 18, 2014 |
Reviews
RustDesk
RustDesk is an open-source remote desktop application designed as a self-hosted alternative to TeamViewer. It offers secure, cross-platform remote access and control, making it ideal for users seeking privacy and flexibility.
Enables remote access and control of other computers, providing a secure and efficient alternative to proprietary solutions.
Pros
- + Open-source and self-hostable, ensuring privacy and control
- + Written in Rust, offering performance and security advantages
- + Active and large community with high GitHub engagement
- + Regular updates and strong development activity
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Potential privacy concerns with Chinese root certificates
Chrome Remote Desktop
Chrome Remote Desktop allows users to remotely access and control another computer directly through the Google Chrome browser, eliminating the need for third-party software. Built using Electron.js, it offers a free and cross-platform solution for remote access, leveraging Google's infrastructure for secure connections.
Enables remote access and control of another computer using the Google Chrome browser.
Pros
- + Free and open-source under MIT license.
- + Cross-platform compatibility.
- + Integration with Google accounts for secure access.
- + No third-party software required for remote access.
Cons
- - Lacks auto-update functionality.
- - One open GitHub issue indicating potential bugs.
- - Resource-intensive due to Electron.js framework.